The Father of the U.N. was an American Communist
All of this seemed well and good until three years later. Alger Hiss was exposed as a Communist spy and sent to prison. Only then did people understand why the emblem of the United Nations looked so much like the emblem of the Soviet Union. It now made sense that the Soviet Union, at Yalta, was given control over all of Eastern Europe. Then everyone understood how the Soviet Union managed to capture three votes in the U.N. General Assembly compared to one for the United States. Then it became clear why a secret deal had been struck stating that a communist would always hold the office of of head of the U.N. military.
The U.N. Charter was authored by a Communist, the first U.N. Secretary-general was a Communist, and the U.N., from the beginning, was designed to be a Union of World Socialist Republics.
On a recent tour of the U.N., not one mention was made of any of this by our guide. Hiss’ name was not mentioned one time. When pictures of the founding conference contained his picture, our U.N. guide avoided telling us who it was.
I’m sure everyone was taught about the United Nations and its importance in school, but I’m also sure that the above information was conveniently omitted from your textbooks!
Secret agreement: The U.N. military is to always be commanded by a Communist
One of the most important positions within the entire United Nationsâ€”if not the most importantâ€”is that of Undersecretary-general for Political and Security Council Affairs. Most Americans have never even heard of this position, much
less anything about the man who holds the job. The undersecretary-general for political and security council affairs has three main areas of responsibility. They are:
- Control of all military and police functions of the United Nations peacekeeping forces.
- Supervision of all disarmament moves on the part of member nations.
- Control of all atomic energy ultimately entrusted to the United nations for peaceful and “other purposes.”
In view of the fact that these three functions may soon constitute the ultimate power of life and death over every human being on the face of the earth (once national disarmament is achieved and all military is under the control of the U.N.), there would appear to be some minor justification for us to be more than passingly curious over who wields this power. Since the United Nations was created in 1945 there have been fifteen men appointed to the position of undersecretary-general of political and security council affairs. Astonishingly, every single one of them has been a communist!
Communists appointed to the position of UN Undersecretary-General:
- Arkady Sobolev – USSR (1946-1949)
- Konstantin Zinchenko – USSR (1949-53)
- Ilya Tehernychev – Ygoslavia (1954-1957)
- Anatoly F. Dobrynin – USSR (1958-1960)
- Georgi Ptrovich Arkadev – USSR (1960-1962)
- Eugeny Dmiterievich Kiselev – USSR (1962-1963)
- Vladimir Pavolovich Suslov – USSR (1963-1963)
- Alexie E. Nesterenko – USSR (1965-1968)
- Leonid N. Kutakov – USSR (1968-1973)
- Arkady N. Shevchenko – USSR (1973-1978)
- Mikhail D. Sytenko – USSR (1978-1981)
- Viacheslav A. Ustinov – USSR (1981-1986)
- Uasiliy S. Safronchuk – USSR (1987-1992)
- Vladimir Petrovsky – Russia, former USSR (1992)
- James O. C. Jonah – Sierra Leone (Co-chairman)
Some observers feel that 15 Communists out of 15 appointees constitutes a trend of sorts. But whatever we call it, Trygve Lie, the first secretary-general of the United Nations, revealed that this pattern was no mere coincidence. In his book In the cause of Peace Lie wrote: “Mr. Vyshinsky (of the USSR) did not delay his approach. He was the first to inform me of an understanding which the Big Five had reached in London on the appointment of a Soviet national as assistant secretary-general for political and security council affairs…
“Mr. Stettinius (U.S Secretary of State) confirmed to me that he had agreed with the Soviet delegation in the matter…
“The preservation of international peace and security was the organization’s highest responsibility, and it was to entrusting the direction of the Secretariat department most concerned with this to a Soviet national that the Americans had agreed.” (From ‘The Fearful Master‘ by Edward Griffin)
Every U.N. Secretary-General has been a Socialist
No wonder someone said that the truth is stranger than fiction! This incredible saga of the United Nations just goes on and on. Perhaps the most revealing fact of all concerning the powers that control the United Nations is that every single Secretary-General since the U.N.’s formation has been a socialist.
Trygve Lie, from Norway, was the first elected head of the U.N. He was chosen by the 15-member U.N. Security Council and ratified by the U.N. General Assembly on February 1, 1946. Before that, at the age of 23, he had been appointed secretary in charge of administration of the Norwegian Labor Party. The socialist lawyer served as Minister of Justice until June 1939, when a Cabinet reorganization made him Minister of Commerce. In April 1945, Lie was chosen to head the Norwegian delegation to the United Nations Founding Conference at San Francisco. At the conference itself he was chosen chairman of Commission III which was charged with drafting the charter of the Security Council of the United Nations, “the organ…which would have the power to act against aggressors.”
Dag Hammarskjold, of Sweden, was elected Secretary-General of the United Nations on April 7, 1953. At the age of 30 years Hammarskjold had become Undersecretary of the Swedish Ministry of Finance. At the Ministry he worked under the Fabian Socialist economist Ernst Wigforss, whom he once said considered his second father. Sweden has long been the leading Socialist state of Western Europe, taxing its citizens at a 75% rate.
U Than, of Burma, was elected Secretary-General of the U.N. on November 30, 1962. According to Current Biography 1962, U Thant considered himself a democratic Socialist.
Kurt Waldheim, of Austria, took office as Secretary-General of the United Nations on January 1, 1972. Waldheim had been Austria’s U.N. ambassador from 1964 to 1968. When the Austrian Socialist party won the March 1970 elections, Waldheim again became Austria’s U.N. representative. After serving two terms as U.N. Secretary-General, Waldheim became the head of Austria. It was revealed that Waldheim had lied about his role while serving in the Nazi forces of Adolf Hitler. Facts that were made known resulted in Waldheim being banished from the United States, even though he was the head of Austria.
Javier Perez de Cuellar, became U.N. Secretary-general on December 15, 1981. In his address to the General Assembly after being sworn in, Perez de Cuellar called the disparity in wealth between rich and poor nations a violation of “the most fundamental human rights.” During his administration, some third-world spokesmen complained that Perez de Cuellar had not been sufficiently outspoken in promoting the massive transfer of resources from rich to poor nations on a global scale. (Wealth redistribution has always been the central plank in the platform of International Socialism). “I am a Third-World man,” the Secretary-General replied. “But first of all I am a representative of 157 countries. I have to act in a way so that I am not only the representative of the Third World.”
Boutros Boutros-Ghali, the former foreign minister of Egypt, became the first African to head the U.N. on January 1, 1992. “If I was offered the job (of Secretary-General) five years ago,” Ghali said, “I would have turned it down. The U.N. then was a dead horse, but after the end of the Cold War, the U.N. has a special position.” Politically, Boutros-Ghali was a member of the Arab Socialist Union.
Is it coincidence that one Communist and six Socialists have headed the United Nations since its birth in 1945? Does it seem strange at all that the driving message of the U.N., the message of wealth redistribution, is the central message of international Communism? Don’t you find it amazing that the United States has allowed the Soviet Union to have three votes to one for America in
the United Nations since 1945? With the supposed dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1992, each of the 15 member of the ex-Soviet Union now have a vote in the U.N. So now America is outvoted 15 to 1. Yet Russia retains the right to invade these states if they get out of line.
So what does all this mean? the plain truth is that the United Nations has been designed to be a communistic world government from its very beginning.
What will happen? The United Nations will obtain the world domination that it has been planning for since its beginning. Communism will achieve its dream of ruling the world, but only for a very short time.