Danger Of War Between China And Japan Over Five Disputed Islands


China Organizes Popular Protests Against Japan

Pentagon Chief in Tokio for Preparations

.

Exchanging warnings but avoiding confrontations thus far, Chinese and Japanese ships have come within less than half a  nautical mile of each other in an ongoing dispute over the sovereignty  of contested islands.

Amid deepening tensions in a long-running saga over the uninhabited  islands, known as Senkaku in Japan and Diaoyu in China, US “Defense”  Secretary Leon Panetta warned Sunday about the possibility of war between the two Asian countries.  “What we don’t want is to have any kind of provocative behavior on  the part of China or anybody else result in conflict,” he told reporters  accompanying him on a trip that includes stops in Japan, China and New  Zealand.  Panetta met with his Japanese counterpart Satoshi Morimoto, in Tokyo on Monday, Sept. 17, 2012.

“My purpose will be to urge that they engage in the effort by the  Asian nations to try to work out a format for resolving these issues,”  he added, referring to a code of conduct developed by the Association of  Southeast Asian Nations in a bid to manage unconnected territorial  disputes between China and ASEAN members in the South China Sea.

Asked again about the concerns, Panetta said he was worried that  “when these countries engage in provocations of one kind or another over these various islands, that it raises the possibility that a  misjudgment on one side or the other could result in violence and could  result in conflict, and that conflict would then, you know, have the  potential of expanding.”

“We’re going to face more of this, countries are searching for  resources,” he added. “There’s going to be questions raised as to who  has jurisdiction over these areas. There has got to be a peaceful way to  resolve these issues.”

Any conflict between Japan and China could risk drawing in the United States.

Although the U.S. position is that is does not take sides in the  territorial dispute the Obama administration, like the Bush  administration before it, has confirmed that the islands fall within the  scope of article five of the 1960 US-Japan Treaty of Mutual  Cooperation and Security – an appraisal rejected by Beijing.  The treaty’s article five states: “Each Party recognizes that an  armed attack against either Party in the territories under the administration of Japan would be dangerous to its own peace and safety  and declares that it would act to meet the common danger in accordance  with its constitutional provisions and processes.”

The Senkaku/Diaoyu islands, located about halfway between the Chinese  mainland and Japan’s southernmost island  of Okinawa, have been under  disputed Japanese control since the late 19th century.

Earlier this month the Japanese government signed an agreement to buy  three of the five islands from their owner, a businessman who has  rented them to the government since 2002. China described the move as  illegal and in response made a submission to the United Nations defining  its territorial claims in the vicinity.

China late last week deployed at least six surveillance ships to  waters around the islands, to begin what the country’s China Marine  Surveillance (CMS) division describes as “patrol and law enforcement”  operations.

Beijing’s official Xinhua news agency, citing a reporter onboard one  of the vessels, said three Japanese coastguard ships and three  helicopters monitored the group of Chinese ships and that the two sides  had exchanged warnings by radio, each informing the other they were  violating sovereignty. The ships had come within less than half a  nautical mile (less than 3,000 feet) of each other, it said.

Anti-Japan protests

Photo: Chinese protesters shout slogans outside the
Japanese Embassy in Beijing on Monday, Sept. 17, 2012

.

Communist Chinese authorities, who usually do not tolerate large public  protests, have permitted anti-Japan rallies in dozens of cities across  China, and in some cases Japanese cars and property have been attacked  and damaged.  Chinese media noted that weekend demonstrations by tens of thousands  of protestors were described by observers as the biggest targeting Japan  since relations between the two former enemies were normalized in 1972.

Official media outlets appear to be seeking a balance between firing  up emotions with impassioned criticism of Japanese policies, and  cautioning against overreaction.  A People’s Daily article Saturday, for example, used emotive  terms to describe Japanese officials’ behavior, warning they were  “digging their own graves and will ultimately pay a heavy price.”  It is interesting to note how Communists always use the same revoltingly bragging war rethoric used by the always-loosers Muslim Arabs.

On Sunday an article in the same publication – a Communist Party  mouthpiece – said that citizens’ public expression of “patriotism” was a  “natural reaction,” but also cautioned against law-breaking. “Wisdom is  needed in the expression of patriotism,” it said.

Global Times, also Communist Party-affiliated, on Monday rejected criticism that Beijing was allowing protests to turn ugly.  “There is no reason to suspect that the government is turning a blind  eye to the violence seen over the weekend,” it said. “This is simply  the view of those who make a habit of criticizing the government.”  Reality is that they do not allow it, they order it.

The protests are expected to pick up on Tuesday, which is marked in  China in memory of Japan’s occupation of parts of its territory last  century. (The ‘Manchurian incident” on September 18, 1931 was an  orchestrated act of sabotage, viewed as a pretext for Imperial Japan’s  invasion of the region, which was occupied until the end of World War  II.)

.

Source: CNSnews

Advertisements

One thought on “Danger Of War Between China And Japan Over Five Disputed Islands

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s