The Betrayal of Israel By Hidden Islamist Barack Hussein Obama Is Undeniable And Evident


History not only repeats itself to boredom,
but also to tragic, repeated, and totally unnecessary consequences

In recovery and pop psychology circles there is a widely popularized definition of insanity which goes:  “Insanity is repeating over and over the same action while expecting a different result.”  What an undebatable truism!

Israel has run down many times the same treaded path upon which we are at this moment with respect to the genocidal bellicosity of an enemy (currently Iran) the emboldened Muslim Arab mob of the Middle East, and the hope and trust that many in Israel — chief among them the last several governments — have deposited on a deceitful “friend” (currently America).  Yes, yestercentury our hope was on the help of Egypt, and nowadays we do the same with the United States of America.  Make no mistake, the result shalll surely be the same; and if we expect something different is because we are entirely delusional, and therefore insane.

Isaiah 31:1
Woe to those who go down to Egypt for help and rely on horses; and to those who trust in chariots because they are many, and in horsemen because they are very strong, but they do not look for the The Holy One of Israel, neither seek HaShem!

.

Isaiah 36:6
Behold, you trust in the staff of this broken reed — on Egypt — on which if a man leans it will go into his palm and pierce it!  So is Pharaoh King of Egypt to all that trust in him.

.

Isaiah 36:9
How then will you turn away the face of one Officer of the least of my Master’s Servants, and put your trust upon Egypt for chariots and for horsemen??!!

.

2 King 15-17
15  And when the servant of the Man of G-d (Prophet Elisha) was risen early, and went forth, behold, an army surrounded the city with horses and chariots.   And his servant said unto him: “Oy, my lord!  What shall we do?”  16  And he answered, “Do not fear because those who are with us are many more than those that are with them.”  17  And Elishah prayed and said:  “Hashem, open now his eyes so that he can see.”  And HaShem opened the eyes of the servant and he saw; and behold, the mountain was full of horses and chariots of fire were all around Elishah.

Anti-Semite US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR) may very well have told American Jewish leaders who came to him pleading for his help in the rescue of the trapped Jews of Europe in the early 1940s something similar to what was uttered by president Barack Obama last March at the AIPAC conference in Washington: “There should not be a shred of doubt by now: when the chips are down, I have Israel’s back.” Like his Democratic Party predecessor, Obama has deceivingly expressed comforting words to American Jewish leaders, but has refrained from taking decisive action that would substantiate his words. An example of which is the last round of sanctions against Iran that were brought to the President’s desk in December 2011 by Senators Menendez (D) and Kirk (R), and endorsed in the Senate 100-0, that Obama sought to change the language of and diminish its intent.

Republican U.S. Congressman Hamilton Fish (R-NY) accused FDR in the 1940s, as news of death camps was unfolding, of “spiritual anesthesia” for not taking a stand to save the European Jews. According to Fish FDR’s silence may have been the deciding factor in Hitler’s execution of the “Final Solution.”  Fish argued that had “FDR made a definitive announcement out of the White House, it might well have stopped the megalomaniac Hitler or at least brought home the truth to the German and Polish people, most of whom probably knew little of Hitler’s extermination policy.”

Obama is a Muslim enemy of IsraelIn a similar vein, had Obama made a definitive statement that declared America’s “red lines” on Iran’s nuclear weapons development, and the consequences for Tehran of crossing such lines, the present situation, which threatens the lives of six million Jews in Israel and elsewhere, would not have arisen.  Instead, Obama dispatched the chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff General Martin Dempsey to express opposition to a unilateral Israeli military action against Iran.  Dempsey shamelessly said in London, “I don’t want to be complicit if they (Israel) choose to do it.”  Evidently he and his nefarious boss in Washington prefer to be complicit in the genocide of more than 6,000,000 Jews in Israel, thus equating themselves to the Nazis of Germany.

According to the September 3, 2012 Israeli daily Yediot Ahronot,

The Obama administration, informed Iran via two European nations, that it would not back an Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities, as long as Tehran refrains from attacking American interests in the Persian Gulf.”

Obama is a Muslim traitorIn late March of this year, former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton told Fox News that the Obama administration leaked a story which revealed that Israel had been granted access to airfields in Azerbaijan located along Iran’s northern border.  Bolton was responding to a Foreign Policy magazine article, and stated on Fox “I think this leak today is part of the administration’s campaign against an Israeli attack on Iran.”  He went on to say that a strike from Azerbaijan “would be much easier for the Israelis than a strike launched from their own country — jets could stay over their target longer and worry less about refueling.”  Bolton added, that “tipping the Israelis’ hand by revealing very sensitive, very important information could frustrate such a plan.”

In his book, ‘Obama’s Betrayal of Israel’, author Michael Ledeen provides evidence that President Obama is uninterested in Israel’s security and that he constantly sends messages to the world to that effect.  Ledeen writes that Obama personally attended a ceremony awarding the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Israel basher Mary Robinson.  She is the former Irish PM and the UN official who presided over the infamous anti-Israel Durban Conference in 2001.

Obama’s claim that American support for Israel is “unbreakable” is either naïve or disingenuous.  Clearly, one cannot claim to be dedicated to Israel’s security and at the same time advocate a Palestinian State.  Hamas declares its intentions to eradicate the Jewish state openly and regularly, while in Ramallah, Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas seeks a unity government with Hamas, and rejects direct negotiations with Israel.  But there is more

  1. Earlier this year Obama authorized $192 million to go the Palestinian Authority.
  2. He lifted the ban on financial aid to the Palestinian Authority imposed by the U.S. Congress, claiming that it was “important to the security interests of the United States”!
  3. Similarly, Obama continues to support the Muslim Brotherhood regime in Cairo with $1.2 billion in U.S. taxpayer money.
  4. At the same time, Obama is refusing to meet Netanyahu later this month, following his humiliating treatment of Netanyahu on a previous visit to the Obama White House.

Israelis, according to Ledeen, get the picture, and in a recent poll, only 4% of Israelis said that they thought B. Hussein Obama’s policies were supportive of Israel.  In other words, 96% considered Obama unfriendly towards Israel.  Actually, we believe he is an Islamic enemy of Israel.

There are two ways to implement the destruction of Israel is:

  1. to enable Iran to acquire nuclear weapons and
  2. tie Israel’s hands by preventing it from striking Iran preemptively while there is still time.

Well, Obama has blocked Israel from destroying Iran’s nuclear facilities, and he is shameless and tirelessly doing all he can to make sure Iran gets the time it needs to produce a nuclear bomb.  The useless 5+1 talks with Iran certainly bought time for Iran, and the U.S. sanctions imposed against Iran have had some impact on the Iranian economy, but didn’t halt Iran’s race towards a nuclear weapon.

Obama is as well aware of these facts just as FDR knew of the gas chambers in Auschwitz.  Another way of undermining Israel is by fostering a terror-prone “Palestinian” State, and that is what Obama has done.

In a recent interview on Israel’s Arutz Sheva, former Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Zalman Shoval said that Israeli and U.S. interests diverged when it came to Iran. “We need to get used to the fact that, as usual, we are alone.”  A diplomat, Shoval was careful not to point a finger at Obama but the implications of Obama’s policies are clear. Shoval did however compare the current situation with the days before the Six Day War, when Israel received no support from the Johnson Administration, and was told point-blank by President Johnson that if Israel took the initiative and attacked Egypt, it would have to suffer the consequences, despite the fact that Egypt had committed an act of war by closing off the Straits of Tiran.

The difference today, as compared to 1967, is that Israel’s enemy – Iran – might use a nuclear weapon that could incinerate a sizeable portion of Israel.

According to Shoval, the U.S. knows that it must prevent Iran from going nuclear – not to save Israel, of course, but to save its strategic position in the world, and in the Middle East in particular. Eventually, Shoval said, the U.S. might act, but by the time they do it may be too late. The U.S., he added, wants to put off the confrontation with Iran for a year or two, but every delay gives the Iran another advantage. Obama, as Shoval sees it, is much more interested in being reelected than dealing with the Iranian threat. And, should he be reelected, his domestic concerns, i.e. the economy, will trump national security issues such as Iran.

The Iranian-based Press TV reported on September 11, 2012 that “The U.S. rebuffed Israel over Iran ‘red lines’.”  Prime Minister Netanyahu had called for the U.S. to declare “red lines” over Tehran’s nuclear program on Sunday (9/9/12), warning that in the absence of such a statement Iranian officials would not take seriously Washington’s implied threat of military action. “The sooner we establish one, the greater the chances that there won’t be a need for other types of action,” he told Canada’s CBC News. Asked on Sunday (9/9/12) whether the administration would set out red lines or deadlines, Hillary Clinton, the U.S. Secretary of State replied on Bloomberg Radio that “We are not setting deadlines.”

In an entry in Assistant Secretary of State Breckinridge Long’s dairy on October 3, 1940, he noted that President Roosevelt (FDR) supported his policy of encouraging U.S. consulates to “postpone, and postpone and postpone” the granting of visas to European Jews.  This is reminiscent of Obama’s policy of postponing action against Iran.  The results may be the same, the betrayal of Israel’s Jews … but this time around HaShem is going to pass the final Bbill to America.  Some or many Jews shall fall but the total doom of America is truly at hand.

.

Source: TheJerusalemConnection

Advertisements

Pentagon Chief Panetta Cynically Says That Setting Red Lines On Iran Would Paint The US Into A Corner


With his Typical Cynicism, He Says that in the ‘Real World’
Leaders Do not Operate According to Red Lines!!!
[ Of Course, It’s Only According to Secret Agendas ]

.

The Betrayal of America on Israel Deepens Even Deeper
A Practical Lesson for Other American Allies

.

Breaking the Alliance Between the US and Israel
The Obama Government is Decided to Leave Israel Alone
In Front of a Nuclear Threat From Iran

.

Obama wants To Wait Until after Israel Is Nuked By Iran
Only Then it Might Act … or maybe not

.

.

Ignoring the growing vicious Islamic Hatred against America and the continuying loyalty of Israel, the US “Defense” Secretary, Leon Panetta, added his deceiving voice to the chorus of anti-Israeli American officials rebuffing Israel’s right to call for “red lines” on Iran, saying he did not want to see the US put in a corner.  He also intentionally ignored the fact that the only country painted into a lethal corner in all this affair is Israel by the pro-Islamic government of Obama. He told Foreign policy magazine in an interview published Friday night.

“The fact is, look, presidents of the United States, prime ministers of Israel or any other country — leaders of these countries don’t have, you know, a bunch of little red lines that determine their decisions.”

The US and Israel became embroiled in a standoff last week after first US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and then President Barack Obama both publically said they would not set red lines on Iran’s nuclear program, beyond which military action would be used.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has called for such lines as a way of calming understandable Israeli fears over Iran’s drive toward a nuclear weapon intended to “erase Israel off the map”.

After Clinton’s comments Netanyahu justifiably rebuked Washington, saying that “a country that would not set red lines has no right telling Israel not to take military action itself.”  The genocidal intent of Obama against Israel is clear.  He obviously does not want to put any red lines against the nuclear belligerancy of Iran, but he firmly puts a giant red block in front of the self-defense of Israel.

On Friday, Panetta seemed to admonish Netanyahu over his attempt to push the US into committing to an ultimatum, saying that it is not how the real world works.  He told the magazine,

“What [leaders] have are facts that are presented to them about what a country is up to, and then they weigh what kind of action is needed to be taken in order to deal with that situation. I mean, that’s the real world. Red lines are kind of political arguments that are used to try to put people in a corner.”

The US is insistent that it is committed to Israel’s security, even without going along with Netanyahu’s demands.  But we Israeli understand very clearly his true meaning:  “The US goverment is committed to Israel’s destruction.”

Meanwhile on Friday, Obama told straight face, as he does when he lies (which is always) a group of rabbis that there was no space between Washington and Jerusalem on the Iranian issue. “There may come a time,” Obama said, that the United States would “exercise a military option” to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

Obama on Thursday said the US’s red line would be a nuclear Iran!  That is, the Us now says that when Iran has “the bomb” it would act; butt then after Iran has “the bomb” the talking point will be that it is dangerous to attack another nuclear country.  So at any rate we in Israel will be left to deal with Iran on our own.  The evil game is all too clear and does not deceive anyone but those who want to be deceived.

Giving a clear picture of what happens when Jews in Galut bow to the false “god” Mammon, or money — which is what keeps them there — 70% of Jews in America are ready to vote for this engender of Muslim malice against the interest of survival of their own people.  They are unable to see that they are foolishly helping to dig their own tomb.  The Second Shoah is on their way, and they are cooperting with its establishment!

Sources in Jerusalem have said Netanyahu will continue to push for clear red lines on Iran, even despite the blowback.  And one wonders, what is it that prevents the intelligent mind of a secular Jew to see, grasp, understand and accept Reality?  The sad answer to this is:  The lack of HaShem in their lives.  The absence of HaShem in them voids them of any Wisdom despite the fact that they may be very intelligent.  The first one is “Spiritual Intelligence,” the second one is mere “animalistic intelligence.”  What a loss!  And what bad consequences it always brings.

A senior official in Jerusalem told Yedioth Ahronoth Friday that Netanyahu was adamant about the issue (the US-rejected red lines), believing that “as long as Iran isn’t faced with a clear deadline, it will continue to develop nuclear weapons undisturbed.”  The source made the statement following the publication of a New York Times report, earlier Friday, detailing some of the content of an hour-long phone conversation between the two leaders on Tuesday.

According to the report, Obama rejected Netanyahu’s request for the US to specify red lines which, if crossed by Iran, would trigger US military action.  The report said, quoting a senior administration official,

“Mr. Obama deflected Mr. Netanyahu’s proposal to make the size of Iran’s stockpile of close-to-bomb-grade uranium the threshold for a military strike by the United States against its nuclear facilities.”

Instead, the Muslim usurper of the presidency of America “repeated the assurances he gave to Mr. Netanyahu in March that the United States would not allow Iran to manufacture a nuclear weapon. But he was unwilling to agree on any specific action by Iran — like reaching a defined threshold on nuclear material, or failing to adhere to a deadline on negotiations — that would lead to American military action.”

Israel is surrounded by enemies and alone.  But that is the best place in which we can be since it is then when the Help from HaShamayim is unleashed upon us.  Notwithstanding, a war is coming and many in Israel might fall, but for every Jew fallen how many Americans will?  The Iron Babylon of our days, the emporium of riches and power is about to fall because of this betrayal, as it says:

Jeremiah 51.36
Therefore, thus says HaShem: “Hineini (here I am), I will defend your cause [Israel’s cause] and I will take vengeance for you.

Jeremiah 51.49
Bavel must fall because of the slain of Yisrael just as the slain of kol ha’aretz (all the earth) have fallen because of Bavel.

Jeremiah 51.53
“Though Bavel should ascend up to shamayim (the sky), and though she would fortify her stronghold in the heights, yet plunderers shall come unto her from Me,” says HaShem.

For more read “America Is About To Betray Israel

.

Source: TimesOfIsrael

Suddenly Obama Refuses to See Netanyahu, and so He Sharpens The Iran Dilemma


Obama Is Coming Out of the Closet
As The Anti-Israel Muslim HE IS

Imagine How It Will Be When He Gets Reelected
American Jews, Time Is Running Out
Make Aliyah Before I’ts Too Late

Do not miss my Article “America Is About To Betray Israel
to know the Consequence of this for Israel and America

UPDATE:  Reports claim Obama will be a guest on the David Letterman TV Show instead of meeting with Netanyahu.

[ It is becoming increasingly evident that Obama is a Muslim that hates Israel and all the Jews – even though he uses some self-hating Jews for the sake of deception.  I thought that we would see this open confrontational position a few days after the reelection of Obama; but the man, and his higher up handlers, are too desperate to cause the destruction of Israel, and later the rest of the World Jewry.  What he is doing is trying to destabilize Bibi’s government by denying credibility abroad and insuflating divisions in Israel. Will the American Jews finally “see the light.” It is difficult to think of it, but Obama is a Hitler-wannabe; after all we though that no one could ever surpass Haman, nakhon? ]

Prime Minister of Israel Binyamin Netanyahu and Obama

At odds and not talking

President Barack Obama’s refusal Tuesday Sept. 11 to see Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu because “the president’s schedule will not permit that,” left Jerusalem thunderstruck – and Washington too.

At one stroke, round after a round of delicate negotiations on Iran between the White House, Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem, the US National Security Council, Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta collapsed.  They had aimed at an agreement on a starting point for the meeting that had been fixed between the two leaders for Sept. 28 in New York to bridge their differences over an attack on Iran’s nuclear program.

The pathetic king of Arrogance

By calling off the meeting, the US president has put paid to those hopes and publicly humiliated, again, the Israeli prime minister, turning the clock back to the nadir of their relations brought about by the comment by Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on Aug. 30: “I don’t want to be complicit if they [Israel] choose to do it” – meaning attack Iran.  [ As if attacking Iran was a criminal act.  Well, it is in the twisted mind of Muslims and anti-Semites. ]

By rebuffing Netanyahu, the president demonstrated that the top US soldier was not just talking off the cuff but representing the president’s final position on a possible Israel strike to preempt Iran’s nuclear program.

Tuesday, the US Defense Secretary said on Iran:

“If Iran decides to make a nuclear weapon, the US would have a little more than a year to stop it.”  He added that the United States has “pretty good intelligence.”

Panetta said on CBS’s “This Morning” program:

“It’s roughly about a year right now. A little more than a year.  And so … we think we will have the opportunity once we know that they’ve made that decision, take the action necessary to stop (Iran).”

Panetta said the United States has the capability to prevent Iran from building an atomic bomb.  He said:

“We have the forces in place to be able to not only defend ourselves, but to do what we have to do to try to stop them from developing nuclear weapons.”

Muslim Obama bows to the king of Sudi Arabia, who is the Islamic Keeper of the Ka'abah

Some optimists [ read ‘obtuse people’ ] in Jerusalem took these comments to indicate that the crisis had become manageable now that the Obama administration was finally prepared to discuss a timeline and red lines for holding Iran back from making a bomb. This hope was soon dashed by word that the US president would rather confront Israel than Iran.  The White House may also have been incensed by the orders given by Netanyahu and Barak to the IDF to keep going on preparations for attacking Iran alongside the forthcoming meeting between the two leaders.

Netanyahu’s comments to a news conference earlier Tuesday are unlikely to have salved angry administration spirits in Washington.  He said that with every passing day, Iran comes closer to a nuclear bomb, heedless of sanctions and diplomacy.

Netanyahu said on a note of frustration against the Obama administration and the rest of the world, as reported earlier Tuesday:

“The world tells Israel ‘wait, there’s still time’. And I say, “Wait for what? Wait until when?  Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don’t have a moral right to place a red light before Israel.”

[ America thought that it was a very good idea attacking Iraq because there was a rumor that they had “weapons of mass destruction.”  And Saddam never said that he was gooing to “erase America out of the map,” as Iran has repeatedly proclaim that they would do.  Reaality is that most Goyim are of the mind that Jews only have two “human rights”:  to obey whatever we are told … and let others kill us easily.  Well, fat chance!  That will not happen – mind you, at any cost – ever again!  ]

The wrangling over Iran between the offices of the US President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu Monday, has been reduced essentially to a battle for the agenda of their meeting in New York on Sept. 28: Netanyahu will be pressing for a US commitment to military action if Iran crosses still-to-be-agreed red lines, while the White House rejects red lines [ for Iran, but yes for Israel ] – or any other commitment for action – as neither necessary nor useful.

[ Of course, this engender of Evil, Obama, cynically expects that Israel accept the “red lines” he arrogantl and criminally try to impose upon us.  And expects Israel to sheepishly make the commitment to not attack Iran until after Obama’s reelection and we are utterly destroyed.  His Islamic Plan of commiting genocide against the Jews in Israel is now open for all to see. ]

Israel’s latest rebuttal came Monday, Sept. 10 from former Military Intelligence chief, Amos Yadlin, who argued that even without agreed red lines, Israel is quite capable of coping with its enemies without the United States.

[ Oy!  What an affront to the legendary haughty American arrogance!  Imagine that.  “How these Jews dare…  Who do they think they are?!  They are nothing, nothing without us.”  LOL. ]

The sparring appeared to have reached a point of no return, leaving Obama and Netanyahu nothing more to discuss.  However, just the opposite is true.  For both leaders their upcoming tête-à-tête is vital.  It is Obama’s last chance to prevent an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear program before he faces the American voter on Nov. 6, while the prime minister will not forego any opportunity to harness the US to this attack. He needs to prove – not just to the anti-war camp ranged against him at home, but also to assure the military – which has been falsely reported as against an attack – that he bent over backward to procure US backing.  Netanyahu does not feel that even if he fails to talk Obama around (more likely than not), he has lost American support; he counts on the US Congress [ and many among the American people, although the American people does not cout to the agendas of their politicians ] to line up behind Israel’s case for cutting down a nuclear Iran which is sworn to destroy the Jewish state, as well as sections of the US public and media and some of he president’s Jewish backers, including contributors to his campaign chest.  Those are only some of the reasons why the last-ditch US-Israeli summit cannot be avoided and indeed may be pivotal – both for their participants’ personal political destinies, and for the Middle East at large.  Debkafile’s Washington and political sources disclose that their dialogue will have two levels according to current planning:

  1. In New York, Obama and Netanyahu will try and negotiate a common framework;
  2. At the Pentagon in Washington, defense chiefs Leon Panetta and Ehud Barak will be standing by to render any agreements reached in New York into practical, detailed plans which would then be referred back to the two leaders for endorsement.

The heated dispute between US and Israeli officials over “red lines” was therefore no more than sparring over each of the leaders’ starting-points for their New York dialogue and therefore their agenda and final understandings [ maybe ]. Behind the clash of swords, US and Israeli diplomats are working hard to negotiate an agreed starting point. They are putting just as much effort into preventing the row deteriorating into a total rupture before Sept. 28.

Netanyahu discussed another red line Monday when he interviewed [ the suspicious ] President Shimon Peres in Jerusalem, their first meeting in three months.  Although the Israeli presidency is a largely titular function, Peres [ shamelessly ] has elected himself senior spokesman for the opponents of an Israeli military operation against Iran.

While their advisers sought to establish agreed lines between them ahead of Netanyahu’s meeting with Obama, debkafile reports that the confrontation between the two Israeli politicians ended inconclusively, because Peres kept on demanding that the Prime Minister bend to the will of the White House.  [ Hmm, have you noticed how Shimon Peres always sides with the enemies of Israel, who look for our destruction?  Has he being blackmailed for the longest time, or is he just a dark-hearted Sabbatean traitor? ]

.

Source: Debkafile

Israeli EMP Attack on Iran? Be’itah in Tishrei 5773?


.

It Seems the War Will Begin Between Rosh Hashana and the End of Tishrei

According to WND, an American website well-connected in Israel, the Jewish state has ready a ‘secret weapon’ for an attack on Iran. There is a rumor that “something big” will happen between Rosh Hashana and Sukkot. Meanwhile, there have been people having dreams of an atomic blast during that span of time; something that would unify the hearts of Israel and cause Moshiach to come. [I know this thing of dreams is something not too certifiable, but it is well known that in the history of Israel HaShem has communicated things through dreams whenever He though convenient; so, even though I do not put all my bets on this, neither do I reject it out of hand like foolish ignorants do.]

Israel sees Iranian nuclear weapons as an existential threat, and plans are in place to carry out strikes to cripple the nuclear program by the middle of next month. Middle East experts suggest, from discussions with top Israeli officials this week, that there is a strong likelihood the attacks will take place between Sept. 15 and Oct. 15. They estimate a 75% chance that the strikes will be carried out in that 30-day window. According to them, high-ranking Israeli leaders tell them that they have a secret weapon which they intend to deploy for any strikes, but they would not tell what that weapon is. They believe that the likely weapon is an electromagnetic pulse (EMP), which would cripple Iran’s power grid.

EMP Attack

These insiders say that Israel is trying to get a hard promise from the U.S. that they’ll support an attack.” But who is surprised to know that the Obama administration is telling Israel and Iran that the U.S. will not back any Israeli attacks in any way? CIA Director David Petraeus and other American officials are strongly pressuring Israeli leaders to hold off on attacks before the U.S. elections, which is the only thing that counts for them. [What Americans ignore is that if Obama is re-elected by hook or crook, his 2nd term will bring America to a Caliphate estate under Sharia; but since it is so extreme this reality not even his worse oponents would consider it even as a possibility. [Like with any other succesful empire in history, American pride is its worse enemy, and the cause of its downfall]. These experts explain what sort of ironclad promises from President Obama could convince Israel to stand down … temporarily.

WND Senior Staff Reporter Jerome Corsi reported in 2009 on a “secret weapon” being developed and tested by Israel. The test was done at an undisclosed Israeli military base, but few details were uncovered at the time. It was confirmed that the military specifically designed the weapon to be used in a possible conflict with Iran.

The pathetic American General Martin Dempsey, head of the US Chiefs of Staff, may be, he is either a dhimmi or delusional … or much worse, a filthy anti-Semite — like Obama — bent on the destruction of Israel. This is what I and most Israelis believe they are. This is why Washington will not ally with Jerusalem to attack the Iranian nuclear sites. Otherwise, either they swallow the lies of the Mad Dwarf Chimpanzoid that Iran has no nuke wet dream, or they doen’t think the threats to extinguish Israel and the Jews are real. Hardly. Either condition is grounds for dismissal. Hopefully President Romney will attend to that and fires Dempsey in the first week of his administration. [Not that I think that he will be much of a change. American presidents follow the same line whether RepubliCans or DemoRats. The difference is found only in the lyrics of the lullabies they hypocritically sing to the blinded American people at the electoral time]. Yes, I know that Obama is the real problem but generals are paid for real military advice not tuchas kissing,  not for aiding sedition and betraying allies. But that is what they do. So in that tenor, General Palooka Dempsey’s announcement Tuesday 4 September 2012 emboldened Muslims, the savages of the Middle-East.

Yet, G-d works underwraps and Hussein Obama may have out-foxed himself. The Iranians were told no harm, no foul. ‘If you don’t attack US targets or interests, we will play kissy face with you.” From the photo we understand both the Islamic chimpanzoid of Teheran and the Kenyan Muslim usurper in Washington enjoy a full-body contact hug!  Under Obama’s new rule of not supporting an ally or defense treaties, Iran now would be more reluctant to play its trump card, to close the Straits of Hormuz. This means that the flow of oil would be unimpeded and that would mean that world opinion will take longer to go negative, giving Israel a longer time to bomb Iranian nuke sites. How sweet!

Most military experts think the Israelis would win and beat the spread. Israelis are much better trained and better equipped. Israel’s technology is first class and world class, just ask the Iranians trying to debug the computers infected by viruses courtesy of our Israeli hackers. The Israelis do not need American help, especially now when Syria cannot help Iran.

At 2 AM, local time, Friday 19 October 2012, Iran’s electrical systems are shut down by an Israeli EMP attack. This is followed by precision high explosive bombing on nuke sites and key infrastructure sites. This will continue for 10 days, during which time the libtards of the world will try to gin  up the UN to stop the war, which I believe, will be very nearly one-sided. The US Navy will patrol the Straits of Hormuz. Saudi Arabia will bribe the whorish “Palestinians” not to attack US interests in or near the Straits because they want the oil to continue to flow, and they want Iran to take a good beating. If Shi’ite Iran were to win a war against the Jews,  it would become the rock star of Islam and that’s something no Sunni could stomach. It only takes a little Shi’ite to ruin a Sunni day!

I do believe the Muslim Kenyan usurper in Washington intends to sink Israel, but by making Iran think real hard about dragging the US into a separate conflict, this announcement by the American traitor-in-chief will help Israel do what it needs to do without worrying about world opinion immediately going against it. After all, as long as there’s petrol for the moped, Eurabians will be reasonably content for a few days. Besides, by 19  October, Europe may have a lot more problems than protesting the bombing of Iranian Nuke facilities. Waking up to a worthless Euro or Zuero might rivet Eurabians’ attention more than massive property destruction in the land of the chimpanzoid.

Count down! I thought this was going to happen three years ago but I am not sure how Israel can continue to put this off any longer.

Source 1: HaMekubalim

Source 2: WND

Hizballak’s Nasrallah Says that if Israel Attacks Iran, the US Mideast Bases Will Pay Dearly


.

America Betrays Israel and Islam Threatens America

Such Is Divine Justice  –  America’d Better Get Used To It

Attention:  For more Prophesied Judgments of HaShem upon America
for Betraying Israel Click Here

War against nuclear Iran

Cutting through the US-Israeli debate over where to put “red lines” for Iran, Hizballah leader Hassan Nasrallah said on Sept. 3 that Iran would hit US bases in the Middle East in response to any Israeli strike on its nuclear facilities, even if the Americans were not involved in the attack.

Earlier Monday, the New York Times reported on the debate in the White House over whether US President Barack Obama should declare “red lines” for Iran beyond which the US would act, in response to Israel’s complaint that he has been too vague about how far Iran will be allowed to go. But even if Obama did set a clear red line now, the NYT admits its credibility would be questionable: “The US and its allies have allowed Iran to cross seven previous red lines in 18 years.”

The statement by the top US soldier, Gen. Martin Dempsey, last Thursday that America did not “want to be complicit” in an Israeli attack on Iran was interpreted by the prime movers as meaning that US-Israeli discussions in the last two weeks on where to put the “red lines” were at an impasse. In an attempt to contain the fallout from the Dempsey comment and put the dialogue back on track, the White House is sending CIA director David Petraeus to Jerusalem for more “red line” palaver with Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak.

debkafile, which first disclosed his mission Sunday, Sept. 2, voiced doubts about his chances of success. Both parties to the debate know that the sands on a nuclear Iran are running out faster than they can talk. Roughly by the end of this month or early October, Iran will have enough 20-percent enriched uranium for its first nuclear bomb, overtaking any “red lines” and making them irrelevant.

Feeling the approaching heat, Netanyahu called a special cabinet meeting for Tuesday, Sept. 4 with the participation of the heads of Israel’s clandestine services, Military Intelligence, the Mossad, the Shin Bet and the Foreign Office Research Division, to hear their annual report. It is likely to go on all day with updates on the situation in Syria, Egypt and Jordan – all weighty topics. But the agenda will certainly be topped with a detailed rundown on the current state of Iran’s nuclear program. After that rundown, the prime minister and defense minister will enter the final decision-making stage on war against Iran. At this critical moment, wit calculated timing, Petraeus is due to land in Israel. Although the opponents of Netanyahu and Barak are fond of painting them as irresponsible adventurers ready to gamble with Israeli lives, it is Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei who has now raised the stakes in this game of dare and slapped down the highest cards. The red line he instructed the head of Iran’s Lebanese surrogate Hizballah to lay down was unambiguous and designed to leap over the range of steps the US was planning short of war to “forestall an Israeli attack, while forcing the Iranians to take more seriously negotiations…”.

Nasrallah’s pitch took the scenario straight into stage one of the war to come: “If Israel targets Iran, America bears responsibility,” he told the Beirut-based Al Mayadeen TV Monday night. “A decision has been taken in Tehran to respond and the response will be very great,” he said, citing “Iranian officials.” Nasrallah carried a triple message from Tehran to Washington and Jerusalem: 1.  Iran believes an Israeli attack will take place before the US presidential election on Nov. 6;

2.  Tehran is drawing on a powerful deterrent: Lest anyone expected a low-key Iranian response to an attack on its nuclear facilities, the Hizballah leader put them right when he said, “the response will be very great” and “America bears responsibility.”

3. By putting Nasrallah out front as a leading Iranian spokesman, Khamenei signaled that Hizballah would take an active role in the coming conflict. debkafile: The chatter about “red lines” in the last few days has therefore had the effect of stirring the Iranians into preempting them by a single sharp stroke

.

Source: DEBKAfile

Obama Says That What Iran Must Avoid Is US Interests in the Gulf


.

America Gives Iran A Green Light To Do As It Pleases Against Israel

The US sends Iran an indirect message saying it won’t back an Israeli strike on its nuclear facilities as long as Iran refrains from attacking the US facilities in the Persian Gulf

This is Nothing New,
Once Again America Betrays Its Most Trusting Partners
Remember Cuba, old Iran, and others – being the last one Egypt and now Israel
But HaShem Will Cause That Israel Will Be a Big Bone Stuck In Her Throat

.

Just like England threw Czechoslovakia to Hitler,
now America throws Israel to the Ayatollahs.  But this time…


The True Uncaring Obama

.The United States has indirectly informed Iran, via two European nations, that it would not back an Israeli strike against the country’s nuclear facilities, as long as Tehran refrains from attacking American interests in the Persian Gulf, Yedioth Ahronoth reported Monday.

According to the report, Washington used covert back-channels in Europe to clarify that the US does not intend to back Israel in a strike that may spark a regional conflict.

Obama Backstabbed Netanyahu

In return, Washington reportedly expects Iran to steer clear of strategic American assets in the Persian Gulf, such as military bases and aircraft carriers.

Israeli officials reported an unprecedented low in the two nations’ defense ties, which stems from the Obama administration’s desire to warn Israel against mounting an uncoordinated attack on Iran.

Iranian drill in Strait of Hormuz

Iranian drill in Strait of Hormuz

The New York Times reported Monday that Barack Obama is promoting a series of steps meant to curb an Israeli offensive against Iran, while forcing the Islamic Republic to take the nuclear negotiations more seriously. One of the steps considered is “an official declaration by Obama about what might bring about American military action, as well as covert activities that have been previously considered and rejected,” the report said.

Several of Obama’s top advisors believe that Jerusalem is seeking an unequivocal American statement regarding a US strike on Iran – should it actively pursue a nuclear bomb.

Israel hopes such a statement is made during Obama’s address before the UN General Assembly on September 25.

Others in the White House said Israel is trying to drag the US into an “unnecessary” conflict in the Gulf.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said Monday that

“There is absolutely no daylight between the United States and Israel when it comes to preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.”

Carney said that all options remain on the table for Iran. He said the “window for diplomacy remains open,” adding that the diplomatic process remains the best way to deal with the Islamic Republic, though “that window will not remain open indefinitely.”

Cyber war a go?

According to the New York Times, Washington has also sent Iran a back-channel deal suggesting they curb their nuclear ambitions, but Tehran rejected the deal, saying no agreement is possible sans lifting all West-imposed sanctions.

According to the report, the Obama administration is exploring the possibility of mounting a covert operation, as well as waging a “quiet” cyber war against Iran.

President Obama had previously rejected the notion, fearing such cyber assaults would wreak havoc on Iranian civilian life.

Later in September, the United States and more than 25 other nations will hold the largest-ever minesweeping exercise in the Persian Gulf, in what military officials say is a demonstration of unity and a defensive step to prevent Iran from attempting to block oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz.

In fact, the United States and Iran have each announced what amounted to dueling defensive exercises to be conducted this fall, each intended to dissuade the other from attack.

Source: YNet

Teheran, Washington and Jerusalem – They Don’t Decide


.

But If They Don’t, Then Who Does?

.

By Rabbi Lazer Brody

Each passing day brings Iran closer to a nuclear warhead.  Only the blind and the naive

Iran's Nuclear Facilities

Iran’s Nuclear Facilities

would think otherwise.  Despite international sanctions, the Iranian centrifuges are working 24/7 purifying uranium and producing nuclear weapons-grade fuel.

Lately, one after the other, senior American government officials such as the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense have visiting Israel, each carrying the same message:  “Don’t be naughty, you mischievous Israelis!  You may certainly not carry out a preemptive strike against the Iranian nuclear reactors!”

Our leaders answer with their well-known bravado,  “We won’t leave our fate in the hands of others. We’ll do what we need to do when we need to do.”

We certainly agree with the above statement, but our references aren’t the same as theirs.  We don’t leave our fate in the hand of “others” – in other words, other gods.  We leave our fate in the hand of Hashem.

With all the hype in the media, people are frantic.  They hear about Iran day and night.  Syria too is up for grabs, and no one knows in whose hands hundreds of tons of chemical mass-destructive weapons will fall.  Then there’s Hizbulla, Iran’s armed-to-the-gills proxy right on our border too.  Terror is on the rise in lawless Sinai.  What will be?

I asked that question to my beloved teacher, Rabbi Shalom Arush, shlit’a.  Recent events, especially the horror stories of breaches of holiness in the Haredi community, have taken a toll on his health.

Rav Shalom brushed aside the USA, Iran, and all of our other so-called friends and enemies with one backhand gesture.  “They don’t decide our fate,” he said hoarsely.  He had tears in his eyes, his voice was quivering, and he was obviously trying to restrain himself from crying.  It was scary. “This is the Minister of the Smile?” I asked myself.  Rav Shalom was seeing a very dark cloud on the spiritual horizon.

He then quoted the Torah:

And I will bring upon you the sword that avenges the vengeance of Covenant
(Leviticus 26:25)

Rav Shalom then became as fierce as a lion:  “When will people begin to realize that the entire purpose of Torah and mitzvoth is to bring a person to a state of holiness, so he or she can be a worthy vessel for the Divine Presence.  But everyone must know: if they eat Kosher BaDatz, keep Shabbat with stringencies and have long beards – yet they think that their libido is a big mitzvah and their hearts are far from holiness – then they have done nothing!  They’ve completely missed the point of Torah observance.”

Not only have they missed the point, but they aid and abet the enemy.  How?

Rav Shalom quoted Torah and mentioned “the sword that avenges the vengeance of Covenant“.  HaShem incorporated a hard-fast law of cause-and-effect in the fiber of creation: if the Jewish people shall live their lives in holiness, they shall be encompassed within the glorious “clouds of Divine Presence;” they shall lack nothing and shall enjoy every single blessing in life, both material and spiritual.  Not only that, HaShem Himself shall dwell in their midst, so no evil can befall them.

But, if on the other hand, Heaven forbid, the Jewish people forsake the path of holiness, succumbing to temptations mind and body, they shall suffer the consequences of the breach in brit, the holy covenant.  Any breach in Covenant produces a negative spiritual force known as “vengeance of Covenant”.  The vengeance of Covenant is the force that creates a sword of vengeance, the same way that nuclear fuel is the power source of an atomic weapon.

Are you beginning to understand?

The spiritual roots of the Iranian nuclear weapons, the “sword of vengeance” that threatens us today, are all the breaches of holiness within the Torah-observant community.  Maybe you think that’s not fair.  “What about the seculars?” you want to ask.

HaShem expects much more from the Haredi community than He does from the seculars, who grew up in utter ignorance of Torah and Mitzvoth.

People are afraid to be called names.  One “average” Haredi man says, “If I go around closing my eyes, people will think I’m insane.”

Rav Shalom answers, “If you open your eyes, especially to unfiltered web and to Facebook, you will be insane.”

A Haredi woman says (wearing her long Euro-Kastem $1,600 wig and her long but quite-tight satin dress that accents every curve), “Do you expect me to dress like a yachna (Yiddish for ‘old hag’)? I wouldn’t be caught dead like that!” Hey lady, if you continue dressing the way you do, you are creating the sword which will “catch you dead.”

So maybe you’re asking, “What can I do if the whole world is off its rocker and I guard my eyes?”  Or, “What can I do if all the women are ‘in style’ and I dress like ‘Little House on the Prairie?” Rav Shalom that you’re doing a lot – you just might save the Jewish people.

When the Jews arrived at the Red Sea, with the Egyptian Army in hot pursuit from behind and the sea in front, there was an argument in the Heavenly Court if the Jews were worthy of being saved or not.  One man’s dedication – Nachshon ben Aminadav who jumped into the water – tipped the scales in the Jews’ favor and the sea split.  This is what Rebbe Nachman of Breslev calls azut d’kedusha, or boldness for holiness.

Rav Shalom told me that azut d’kedusha is the only weapon which can defeat the sword of our enemies, conventional or otherwise.

So it’s not our enemies or our allies that determine our fate; they don’t decide! Our determination in strengthening personal holiness – guarding eyes for men and modesty for women – is the force that will determine which way the chips fall.  There’s little time left, so let’s get to work.  G-d bless always.

Source Lazer Beams: